A practical introduction to the international standard for quality and competence in medical laboratories — what it covers, who needs it, and what the accreditation process actually looks like.
How corrective and preventive action systems work in regulated clinical environments — the CAPA lifecycle, root cause analysis methods, and what accreditation bodies look for at assessment.
Two categories of software every accredited lab needs — but that are frequently confused. Here is what each one does, where they overlap, and why combining them changes the picture.
Practical steps for building inspection-ready systems before your next accreditation assessment — gap analysis, document readiness, training records, and what assessors actually look for.
Controlled documents are the backbone of any accredited laboratory. Here is how leading labs manage version control, approval workflows, controlled distribution, and the training linkages that make it all work.
Regulatory expectations, assessment methods, documentation requirements, and what to do when an assessment result is unsatisfactory — a practical guide for quality managers and section leads.
A clear explanation of laboratory information management systems — what they do, who uses them, how they differ from a clinical LIS, and what to look for when evaluating options.
How accredited labs deliver results to ordering providers and patients without compromising PHI — authentication requirements, multi-site access controls, audit trails, and direct patient access considerations.
A structured approach to identifying, classifying, investigating, and closing non-conformances in accredited laboratories — including why NCE culture matters as much as NCE process.
Lot-to-lot traceability, expiry management, open-vial stability, storage condition monitoring, and specimen retention — the inventory disciplines that protect test validity and satisfy accreditation requirements.
The two most common laboratory accreditation standards share significant structural overlap but serve different environments. Here is how to determine which one — or both — applies to your operation.
External quality assessment requirements under ISO 15189, CAP, and CBAHI — selecting appropriate PT programs, responding to unsatisfactory results, and using PT data proactively for performance monitoring.
When QMS, LIS, inventory, and client portal software operate in silos, quality suffers in ways that are difficult to measure. Here is what integration actually changes — and what it requires.
A practical survey of major PT providers — CAP, IQMH, CMPT, UK NEQAS, RCPAQAP, and others — and how to build a well-managed PT cycle that satisfies accreditation requirements across jurisdictions.
An overview of CLIA — the US federal statute governing clinical laboratories — and CAP accreditation, the dominant voluntary quality program that provides CLIA deemed status. Includes the Canadian context and how these frameworks interact.
Canada has no federal equivalent to CLIA — laboratory regulation is a provincial responsibility. This article surveys the major frameworks: CPSA in Alberta, DAP in BC, IQMH and OLA in Ontario, and the federal considerations that apply nationally.
Our team works directly with accredited laboratory environments. Reach out to discuss your quality program, technology stack, or accreditation cycle.