← Knowledge Centre
Accreditation

ISO 17025 vs ISO 15189: Which Applies to Your Lab?

The two most common laboratory accreditation standards share significant structural overlap but serve different environments. Here is how to determine which one — or both — applies to your operation.

10 April 2026·6 min read·
Covered inSHELF

When a laboratory begins planning for accreditation, one of the first decisions is which standard applies. ISO 17025 and ISO 15189 are the two most commonly encountered laboratory accreditation standards internationally, and while they share significant structural overlap, they are not interchangeable. Understanding the distinction is important before investing in accreditation preparation.

ISO 17025: testing and calibration laboratories

ISO 17025 applies to laboratories that perform testing and calibration — a category broad enough to include environmental testing, food safety analysis, materials testing, pharmaceutical quality control, and calibration services. It is used across industrial, commercial, and government contexts. The standard focuses on the technical competence of the laboratory and the validity of its measurement processes.

ISO 15189: medical laboratories

ISO 15189 applies specifically to medical laboratories — those that perform testing on human specimens for purposes of diagnosis, management, prevention, or monitoring of disease. The scope includes clinical chemistry, haematology, microbiology, immunology, molecular diagnostics, anatomical pathology, and blood banking. Unlike ISO 17025, ISO 15189 explicitly addresses patient safety considerations, clinical interpretation responsibilities, ethical obligations, and patient welfare.

Key structural similarities

Both standards require a documented management system covering quality policy, document control, and internal audits; defined personnel roles with documented competency; validated and verified measurement procedures; equipment management with calibration and maintenance records; participation in proficiency testing or external quality assessment; and a non-conformance and corrective action system.

Key differences

ISO 15189 goes beyond ISO 17025 in several areas specifically relevant to medical laboratory practice:

  • Pre-examination and post-examination processes — requirements for patient preparation, sample collection, transport, and result interpretation
  • Patient-focused obligations — rights to information, confidentiality, and the ethical responsibilities of the laboratory toward patients
  • Clinical consultation — the requirement to provide interpretation guidance and clinical advisory services to users
  • Critical value management — notification of life-threatening results to responsible clinicians, a patient safety requirement with no direct equivalent in ISO 17025

Multi-standard laboratories

Reference laboratories and specialized testing facilities that perform both clinical diagnostic testing and non-clinical testing (environmental monitoring, food testing, pharmaceutical QC) may need to maintain compliance with both standards for the respective portions of their work. In these cases, a unified quality management system that can be mapped to both standards simultaneously significantly reduces administrative overhead.

Multi-standard support in SHELF

SHELF supports accreditation management under ISO 15189, ISO 17025, CAP, CPSA, CBAHI, and NABL. Requirements are organized by standard, allowing multi-standard laboratories to manage compliance within a single platform without duplicating documentation.

Share this article
Work with Solasta

See how this applies to your lab

Our team works directly with accredited laboratories on quality systems, technology platforms, and accreditation readiness.

Contact the teamMore articles